Also, with the end of the Cold War and the defeat of armed political organisations, the external-internal threat of communism was terminated, and only local manifestations of leftist insurgencies persisted. These discussions reflected a transitional regional scenario: a virtuous circle of democracy and regional integration was facilitating the peaceful resolution of most existing interstate disputes, as well as the introduction of bilateral security cooperation initiatives. Finalmente, discutimos os obstáculos domésticos e estruturais às políticas de defesa da América Latina.Īmérica do Sul defesa segurança missões militares novas ameaças.ĭuring the 1990s, debates about security perspectives took place in both existing and newly created western hemispheric forums, particularly the Organization of American States (OAS). Em seguida, abordamos o conflito entre o conceito de segurança do CDS e as políticas de segurança dos membros. Depois de estabelecer uma estrutura conceitual sobre os papéis militares, mostramos como as duas perspectivas definem as atividades das organizações concorrentes. Enquanto a literatura interpreta esse fracasso como um problema de cooperação, argumentamos que isso se deve a uma tendência regional mais profunda: a tendência de negligenciar a defesa externa em favor de papéis de segurança interna para as forças armadas. Apesar de sua aparente consistência, o conceito de cooperação dissuasiva não se consolidou. Enquanto a Organização dos Estados Americanos (OEA) se concentra no crime organizado e no terrorismo, reforçando os papéis de segurança interna das forças armadas, o Conselho de Defesa Sul-Americano (CDS) prioriza as questões tradicionais de defesa nacional, defendendo papéis militares defensivos externos. South America defence security military missions new threats.Įste artigo analisa as perspectivas conflitantes de segurança das iniciativas de cooperação em defesa do hemisfério e da América do Sul. Finally, I discuss domestic and structural obstacles to the adoption of common Latin American defence policies. Next, I address the conflict between the CDS’s conception of security and the security policies of OAS member states. After building a conceptual framework for clarifying these divergent perspectives, I show how they define the activities of the two competing organisations. While the literature interprets this failure as a cooperation problem, I argue that it is due to a deeper regional trend, namely the tendency to neglect external defence in favour of internal security roles for armed forces. Despite its apparent consistency, the concept of deterrent cooperation has not taken hold. While the Organization of American States (OAS) emphasises domestic roles for armed forces in the region, concentrating on internal threats such as organised crime and terrorism, the South American Defence Council (CDS) emphasises the traditional conception of security, concentrating on the defence of sovereign states against external military threats. This article analyses the competing security perspectives of hemispheric and South American defence cooperation initiatives.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |